In our last article, What Is the Best Way to Lead A Sales Organization? I introduced the concept of a leadership continuum. The leadership continuum comprises four leadership styles which were identified as Tells, Persuades, Participates, and Delegates.
On one extreme, the Task style focuses on telling the individual how and when a task is to be accomplished. Whereas, on the other extreme, the Relational style is focused on delegating responsibility to the person completing the task.
Thus, given these four predominant styles, the question arises, “Is there a preferred or best leadership style?”
My answer is, yes, there is a preferred or best leadership style, but the best style often depends on the situation.
Let’s look at the four styles in detail.
The telling leadership style is characterized by above average levels of task behavior and below average levels of relationship behavior. The sales manager makes all the decisions.
The persuading leadership style is characterized by above-average levels of task and relationship behavior. The sales manager makes all the decisions but also attempts to gain the cooperation of the sales force by explaining what needs to be done and persuading the sales force to carry out the sales manager’s plan. The sales manager makes decisions with input from the salesperson.
The participating leadership style is characterized by above average levels of relationship behavior and below average levels of relationship behavior. The sales manager sets direction by establishing an overall strategy and goal(s) but leaves the decisions about how to achieve the goals to the individual. The sales manager and the salesperson make decisions together.
The delegating leadership style is characterized by below average levels of task and relationship behavior. The sales manager provides little direction, contact, or support for the sales organization. The salesperson makes almost all the decisions.
The quadrant chart below summarizes the four styles of the leadership continuum based on the primary decision-maker.
As you can see, there is no one best style for a sales manager to employ in every situation. However, there is a best style to employ based the situation at hand and the salesperson involved.
A successful sales manager is someone who can flex their leadership style to fit the situation and the salesperson.
As always, questions and comments are welcome. Which leadership style is your primary style? Are you able to flex styles to leverage the situation?
I’d love your help. This blog is read primarily because of the people like you who share it with friends. Would you be kind enough to share it by pressing the share button?
Category: Sales Management
Imagine that you are a young sales representative. Your boss comes along and tells you exactly how he wants you to present the new product your company is launching, to which customers, when he wants it all done, and the results he expects you to achieve.
Again, imagine that you are a young sales representative. Your boss comes along and consults with you to determine the best method to present the new product to which customers, what order you will present to which customers, and what results you expect to achieve.
In the first scenario, the boss is exhibiting what is known as task behavior. In the second scenario, the boss is exhibiting relationship behavior.
There is a lot of research which found both task and relationship behaviors are effective, and both are needed to lead and influence employees in different situations.
Back in the dark ages when I started my sales career, many of my bosses were ex-military officers. Lower level managers mostly came from the Vietnam era. Whereas, the higher-level managers and executives were WWII and Korean War veterans.
But they all had one thing in common. They all had a command and control leadership style. When it comes to command and control leadership the individual says here’s what I want you to do, how to do it, when to do it, and where to do it.
In the command and control leadership style, there’s not a lot of room for creative problem-solving. The command and control style is also known as a task behavior leadership model because it focuses on the behavior of the individual completing a task.
I noticed more and more leaders who were people-oriented, as my career progressed. These people-oriented leaders listened to their employees. They provided an overall direction but also took the time to solicit input on goals and objectives from employees. They even used positive feedback to reinforce the employee’s confidence.
Another substantial difference for relational leaders is their willingness to delegate decision making to employees. The manager is there to provide guidance if it is necessary, but also allows the employee to establish goals, priorities, approaches, and the expected results.
The task behavior style of leadership is autocratic and even has dictatorial traits. Communication is one-way. The boss informs the employee what to do. Supervision is close at hand as the boss monitors the employee to make sure the task is completed as directed.
The relationship behavior leadership style is at the other end of the continuum. This style is characterized by two-way communication. A high degree of delegation means direct supervision is limited but available when needed.
Between the extremes of task and relationship behavior are two intermediate positions on the continuum. They are leaders that persuade and the leader that will participate.
The leader who persuades has a specific task, approach, and expected results in mind. The persuading leader seeks to gain alignment with the employee by convincing the employee to accept the leader’s approach.
The participative leader also has specific tasks, approaches, and results in mind. However, the participative leader engages the employee by seeking input into the proposed plan. Together they develop a plan that melds their thinking and expertise.
The best way to lead a sales organization depends on two things: the salesperson and the situation. There is no one “best” way to lead all sales representatives in all situations.
For example, if a sales representative is new, a leader may tell the sales representative how to create a presentation. This telling/teaching approach is a characteristic of the task behavior style.
On the other hand, if the sales representative is a seasoned, high performer, the leader may delegate responsibility for developing and delivering a presentation. This approach is characteristic of the relationship behavior style of leadership.
In our next article, we will look at the Task versus Relationship behavior continuum in more detail by examining the strengths and weaknesses of each element of the continuum. We will also consider which is most effective in a given situation.
As always, questions and comments are welcome. What leadership style, task versus relationship, have you encountered most often in your career? Which style do you prefer?
I’d love your help. This blog is read primarily because of the people like you who share it with friends. Would you be kind enough to share it by pressing the share button?
Category: Sales Management